https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56875
--- Comment #9 from Brion Vibber <br...@wikimedia.org> --- I would recommend against removing a visible, findable "printable" link. It's entirely likely that the web UI will become more optimized for, well, *the web* in the future. On mobile we already have collapsible sections (thanks to a decade of "article bloat" making articles so huge people can't just skim them easily on a small screen). I fully expect some sort of sane treatment of references to happen at some point replacing the crappy old "numbered footnote" view that *only* makes sense in print. And as we add more audio, animations, video, and other stuff that doesn't print well we'll need to devise appropriate fallback display for these things meant for print and other static forms. As such, a "printable" view in the future will likely not be just a magic stylesheet -- it may involve DOM transformations, alternate rendering, and importing of additional sections that might not have been loaded and displayed on screen yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
