https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54063
Andre Klapper <aklap...@wikimedia.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtrac...@member.fsf.org
--- Comment #1 from Andre Klapper <aklap...@wikimedia.org> ---
General "Where to put Cortado bug reports" discussions:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.devel/3243
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/2009-July/003946.html
I agree that mwEmbed and Cortado feel overexposed in the current Bugzilla
taxomony (being top-level products) but especially for Cortado and for some of
the subcomponents of "mwEmbed" I am not informed enough myself to say how much
they are still actually used in our Wikimedia server setup.
However, quoting https://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/InitialiseSettings.php.txt :
// NOTE: TMH *requires* MwEmbedSupport to function
In my humble opinion, we probably should mass-close the 10 open Cortado tickets
with a comment explaining to upstream these tickets if still valid, and delete
the Cortado product by moving all Cortado tickets
* either under product "MediaWiki extensions" in a new component "Cortado",
* or even under the existing component "TimedMediaHandler" nowadays.
On a related note, wondering if
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_help_%28Ogg%29 is still
up-to-date; I am also surprised that
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:TimedMediaHandler#Wikimedia_status
says that TMH is in beta status.
@mtraceur: Could you clarify and/or tell me more about the use of Cortado and
the mwEmbed subcomponents listed on
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=mwEmbed nowadays?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
