https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56634
--- Comment #25 from PiRSquared17 <pirsquare...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #24) > Locales should only exist in languages that are alive. "ang" is not alive. > There is a Wikimedia subdomain, that once required a locale with the same > code, > but that's no longer true. MediaWiki core has 32% completion now[1] for > MediaWiki core, 87% for MediaWiki core's most used messages. If we look at > purpose, then creating a native language user interface does not contribute a > lot, as there are no native speakers. > > [1] https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Special:LanguageStats/ang Is this a policy or just your opinion? Even if it is a policy, surely community consensus could overrule it. I see no reason why you can't just ?setlang=en if you don't like the Old English interface. Latin has an interface too, and it is (mostly) dead. I admit that Latin is still used a bit (e.g., the Pope), but they're both "old" languages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
