https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #43 from Alvaro <a...@bitergia.com> --- (In reply to comment #38) > I confess not knowing anything about self-merges. Are they still code > contributions? Then they should be counted in our metrics about code > contributions. > > About the "time to respond" metrics ok, if they are instant merges they are > deforming the picture and we need to address this. Questions: Which are "instant merges"? self-merges? We should check it. > > Won't be they be discarded (or minimized) by the calculation of the median, > instead of plain average? The median is better in any case for time to review. We should change to it. > > If they still distort data when calculating the median, I guess be can just > remove all self-merges automatically. Are they marked in the database as > such? I think we can just check that the submitter and the +2 reviewer is the same person. > Otherwise I guess we rely on other facts, like they are only reviewed by > Jenkins, or they are resolved in less than x seconds (?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
