https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55626
--- Comment #8 from Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> --- In a second look I have realized that the graphs at http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-countries.html count reviews. I think it would make more sense that they would count authors. I mean, when it comes to organizations it does make sense to see which organization is funding how much work, and it is good to count that work in reviews. However, our interest in the location of contributors is based on the people, less on the amount of reviews. In the case of our community it is clear that most reviews come from USA and Germany (when the devs fills their data) because this is where most WMF and WMDE (professional, full time) developers are located. Still, if there are a dozen of developers with just a bunch of commits in some other country we definitely want to know. In this case, 10 developers with 5 merged commits each has more relevance than a single developer with 50 commits. Conclusion: it would be good to have the data based on authors. If you want to keep the current graphs that is fine too. When it comes to http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/who_contributes_code.html , we will swap "Submitted per country (aggregated)" for the graph by people as soon as it is available. But this is not a blocker for the KPI anymore, as agreed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
