https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
--- Comment #5 from Voyagerfan5761 <mediaw...@technobabbl.es> 2010-01-29 03:21:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > As a feature requst, I think this belongs in a separate bug. The shortcode > system looks more like normal tag extensions/parser functions/templates to me, > which people can {{subst:#tag: if they wish. > > At the moment the five "transclusion modifiers" (subst:, safesubst:, msg:, > msgnw:, raw:), are fairly orthogonal, though it would not be impossible to > create a new MagicWordArray to handle them all. I think I've been misunderstood. I was reacting to the suggestion of a more general framework for any magic word to hook in at this point in the parse and giving what I thought was a good example implementation. Obviously the shortcodes themselves are more like tag extensions or templates, but the concept of the parser acting on hooks registered by different magic words is what I was presenting. Hopefully that clears it up. I'm not entering a feature request. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l