https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60373
--- Comment #22 from Risker <risker...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Thanks for all of the answers so far. One more question: what will the log > > entries look like? Will they go into the suppression table and show the > > original oversighter and the original oversight log summary and date of > > oversight? > > Log entries will be added to Special:Log/suppress, and should look as if they > had been created via the revdel system. Time, user, log summary will all be > the > same as the original oversight log entry. Thanks, Kunal. What will happen to the Oversight log? Will it remain intact or will it be deleted? Given that over 80% of all oversights (including a lot of weird edge cases) happened on enwiki, it would be useful for it to be kept intact, at least for a period, so that QA checks can be made. Not that there's likely to be a problem, simply that it would be impossible to tell if there is without the original logs for comparison. Also, I'm assuming that this will fix the old attribution glitch. Is that correct? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
