https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61447
--- Comment #4 from Dominic <mcdev...@gmail.com> --- Right, you'll still have problems with user experience if all you do is just uncollapse section 1. Generally, the most important information, which a user expects to see unhidden by default, is the list of definitions. The top-level section will be a language header (like ==English==), but you'd still want to keep the less important subheaders within that section, like Etymology and Translations collapsed, or else it will drown out the more important info. I don't know if there is currently any programmatic way to identify which header corresponds to the part of speech (where the definitions are); here is the list of accepted ones in en.wikt: <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:POS#The_part_of_speech_header_in_English>. There needs to be some configurability for other Wiktionaries, too. (In reply to Brion Vibber from comment #2) > Wiktionary uses sections differently from everything else, it seems, and > doesn't use the lead section as expected. :) > > Could probably make section autocollapsing into a site config variable and > switch it off for Wiktionary, but I should warn that what Wiktionary really > needs is a structured data backend and an appropriate query & display > interface that's custom-done for a multilingual dictionary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
