https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63122
--- Comment #9 from Xiangquan Xiao <xiaoxiangq...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to David Chan from comment #8)
> (2) is correct. Your method is more precise and works for more languages.
> However the old method is faster[*], and completely reliable if it returns
> false. Therefore we should do the following pseudo-code:
>
> function detectTofu ( text ) {
> maybeTofu = <old technique>;
> if ( maybeTofu ) {
> isTofu = <new technique>;
> } else {
> isTofu = false;
> }
> return isTofu;
> }
Hi, how about a sentence only contains 1 tofu, which is common in languages
like Chinese?
detectTofu(text) will return true in such situation. Is that correct?
BTW, I'll test the performance of both techniques and post result here :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
