https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27852
Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pandiculat...@gmail.com
--- Comment #19 from Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> ---
A year later...
Developing an extension? Isn't enough editing wiki pages (improving the
documentation) and perhaps the sidebar (improving UX)?
Different Wikimedia projects have different ways to handle user feedback and
problems reported. en.wiki has
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us , es.wiki has that piece of
JS, other (most) projects basically will address any kind of user feedback via
the Village Pump, and perhaps an email address. Could one tool work for all? In
different languages?
It would be useful to know more about these users getting confused about where
to report problems. Maybe that would help us improving the current
documentation and channels.
Also, for what is worth we are discussing the possibility of moving Bugzilla et
al to Phabricator, where users could follow deep links from wiki pages, log in
with their Wikimedia credentials, and report problems with certain fields
pre-filled. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
