https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64795
--- Comment #5 from Seb35 <seb35wikipe...@gmail.com> --- I don’t think (3) is a good solution since it’s a loss of functionality for DMARC senders and it would add as much code as (2). Between (1) and (2) and status quo, it depends if: * we want show Yahoo, AOL, and other DMARC email providers that DMARC should not be still used → status quo (DMARC senders think they could send emails throught MediaWiki although they couldn’t – I don’t know if the sender of a user-to-user email is warned if the email don’t reach the destination) * we think DMARC is a rather bad solution but we want to mitigate it and we don’t want to penalise non-DMARC senders, and we think DMARC will not be widely implemented as it is currently (still not an IETF RFC) → solution (2) * we think DMARC will be widely implemented in the near future (without proper solution to send an email on behalf of somebody), or we want a quick and/or transitional solution → solution (1) I feel the more conservative approach would be to choose (1) and see how things evolve, particularly given DMARC is not really standardised as of now and only a big-scale experiment by Yahoo and AOL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
