https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
--- Comment #23 from MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> --- (In reply to Ryan Kaldari from comment #22) > I'm not sure I understand what your interpretation of WONTFIX is. According > to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Bug_report_life_cycle... > > "RESOLVED WONTFIX when the reported problem or suggestion is valid, but any > fix of the reported problem or implementation of the suggestion would be > barred from approval by the project's Developers/Maintainers (or product > managers, if existing)." That seems to be Andre's interpretation of resolved/wontfix. He changed that entry in December 2013 (cf. <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Bug_management/Bug_report_life_cycle&diff=849087&oldid=848793>) and then modified it again in February 2014 (cf. <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Bug_management/Bug_report_life_cycle&diff=898451&oldid=850032>). That description is probably wrong. There's certainly more nuance to wontfix than that, anyway. Resolved/wontfix typically means "we're never, ever going to do this, so stop asking." It's a means of ending discussion about (or killing) an idea. That's why it should be used with caution and consideration. It's rare for anyone to be able to give due consideration if a bug is less than 24 hours old. And as stated above, Maryana is as much a product owner or product manager as I am, except I've been around longer. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
