https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #18 from Gabriel Wicke <gwi...@wikimedia.org> --- (In reply to Krinkle from comment #17) > I can't be bothered to read through and interpret the logic of height bound > and width bound and square cropped box ponies. > > But I'm confused by two things: > > 1) I can understand why certain keywords should not result in a cropped > image and thus for 'frame' to now only respect height of width. But ignoring > both seems like a pointless change that is asking to break and upset > existing content. > > Existing usage like [[File:Example.jpg|frame]] would be unaffected, but > existing content like [[File:Test wiki logo notext.png|frame|200x200px]] > will not result in a gigantic 3000px image being framed on the page[1] Note that only 200x200px was scaled so far, and is rare in combination with frame. 200px was *not* scaled with frame, and still isn't. > 2) Wait, we made this change because some old Help documentation page[2] on > mediawiki.org says[3] so? That's not by any means a specification. Also, > that same exact documentation page has an example of > [[File:Example.jpg|frame|50px]] which is now broken[4] by being way too > large. There should be no change here at all. Framed images with only a width bbox specified were not scaled so far. Gabriel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
