https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65910

--- Comment #9 from Quiddity <pandiculat...@gmail.com> ---
(My apologies for continuing this slightly off-topic discussion, within the
bug. I just wanted to add a quick explanation, in case it wasn't already known
by everyone, or in case there are variant conditions at other non-Enwiki
projects which is where I'm most-familiar. :)

(In reply to Romaine from comment #8)
> If it is really not allowed to use a template signature, I certainly would
> have expected that all templates are substed, not just the entered one.

As I understand it, at least on Enwiki, the potential-problem is that signature
template-pages are not usually very widely watchlisted, and hence the many
pages that someone's signature appears on, might easily be vandalized via that
obscure subpage. They're also generally not semi-protected. 
Some users might have many thousands more transclusions than the ~6,000 pages
that your signature-page is in. (
http://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=nl&namespace=2&name=Romaine%2FHandtekening#bottom
) Or they might appear only on a few scattered and obscure talkpages, and not
get seen, *by an editor who can track down the problem*, for many months/years.

As for why secondary-templates in signatures are not automagically subst:d, I
don't know (am not a dev), but it might be worth opening a new bug for it, or
changing this bug to specifically address that issue, or something similar?
I'll leave that up to better minds.
</tangent>

On-topic: I'm continuing to poke at bug 64778, and will treat that as the main
bug for updates. HTH.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to