https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45229
--- Comment #9 from Bartosz Dziewoński <matma....@gmail.com> --- It seems to be that even a very rudimentary broken-by-design dependencies support in addModuleStyles() (bug 61577) would be a better fix for this than preserving the call order (or no fix at all). That said, I'd support just preserving the order too. (In reply to Daniel Friesen from comment #8) > (In reply to Krinkle from comment #7) > > So I can imagine it may be interesting to investigate the possibility of > > keeping the forced sort with the option to perhaps hoist important ones in a > > fixed order. > > ;) Like a dependency system to declare which ones need to be loaded first? Yeah, we really shouldn't create a separate system for dependencies. Sure, we could add a key like 'stylesAfter' to ResourceLoaderFileModule that would effectively implement half-asses dependency support, but why do that if we already implemented dependencies once? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
