https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67042
--- Comment #2 from C. Scott Ananian <canan...@wikimedia.org> --- Hm. The W3C and WHATWG seem to disagree about the status of <rb> and <rtc>. See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26187 and https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26189 Both Firefox and Chrome seems to follow the WHATWG, not the W3C. That is, they parse: <ruby><rb>foo<rp>bar</ruby> "incorrectly" as: <ruby><rb>foo<rp>bar</rp></rb></ruby></div> According to the W3C, the <rb> tag should be closed before the <rp>. So... I'm not sure it's a good idea to add the <rtc> tag at this time. The right thing to do might be to *remove* the <rb> tag, to make us match WHATWG's spec (which lists <rb> explicitly as "non-conforming" in http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
