https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61791
Chad H. <innocentkil...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
CC| |innocentkil...@gmail.com
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from Chad H. <innocentkil...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Technical 13 from comment #5)
> It's not a duplicate. Bug 1575 says "This displays as if &redirect=no were
> included in the URL. No redirection happens." This bug on the other-hand
> says that redirection should most certainly happen.
You're misunderstanding. He's saying "it doesn't redirect [as if you had
appended &redirect=no to the URL, which you didn't]" and very clearly wants it
to redirect. It's the same bug which we've had several duplicates of now (see
those, if you think bug 1575 isn't a dupe alone)
(In reply to Technical 13 from comment #7)
> No, this is different. This bug is a direct request to address the blocker
> as defined by Brion in [[4882#c1]] "A redirect target needs to be raw plain
> text because it's extracted directly, not rendered as wikitext." which is
> why this ticket is a request to change that behavior and render the page as
> wikitext instead of plain text.
Six of one half a dozen of another. It's the same exact request reworded.
If we can't dupe to 1575 how about bug 7727, bug 6196 or the others?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4763 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
