https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67525
--- Comment #7 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <bawolff...@gmail.com> --- > > I verified that the visual impact would be minimal with a power-of-2 > progression with chaining up to 5 thumbnails by running an informal survey > which I invited developers and commons users to participate in. What sort of pictures were on the survey? What settings were used, etc? I just tested the change (using the settings currently at beta cluster). On the first image I tried (a screenshot, which might not be representative of the average content of a png file due to the large amount of small text, but it was something already on my test wiki) the quality was noticeably less (although possibly still in the acceptable range) with bucketing (and things got even worse if one used bucketting + vips). ------ (In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #5) > Doesn't seem to be working on beta. Another way to test: Run http://upload.beta.wmflabs.org/wikipedia/labs/thumb/8/8b/Bn.beta.wmflabs.org.PNG/310px-Bn.beta.wmflabs.org.PNG through exiftool, you get: [..] Thumb Imageheight : 1024 Thumb Image Width : 1280 Thumb URI : file:///data/project/upload7/wikipedia/labs/8/8b/Bn.beta.wmflabs.org.PNG [..] Which would be different if bucketing was working -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
