https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70962
--- Comment #8 from Waldir <wal...@email.com> --- (In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #7) > The browser will not reload the page by itself, we'd need to reload all of > the content or trigger page refresh from JS. This still breaks the back > button behavior for readers who don't care what a redirect is. Why would the browser have to reload the page by itself? I only proposed to have an extra entry appended to the history, that would be loaded by the normal process once the user clicks the back button. Is that not what would happen with this approach? Assuming this works as I think it does, this would indeed change the current behavior, but I wouldn't say it "breaks" it, since that is a quite common pattern on the web (when one page redirects to another, the redirect is kept in the history so one can still get back to it). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
