Qgil added a comment. I have been creating, assigning, and prioritizing [[ https://phab-01.wmflabs.org/maniphest/query/8D10.jANISCm/#R | several tasks in phab-01 ]] combining actions of a user without Bugzilla Etiquette agreement signed and one having signed it. The options seen by each user were always consistent, and I couldn't trigger any error message.
Considering the non-trivial amount of drama we have got over the years in Bugzilla with prioritization (less or no problem with assignment of bugs), maybe it is not a bad idea to make people agree explicitly to the etiquette if they want to enter that game. It is a workflow more predictable than joining a project in order to get permissions. (Also, I have been thinking secretly if anybody has tested what happens when you add 2606 users to a single project) :) HOWEVER, if you are not comfortable about trying a Legalpad-based experiment right now, I would understand. If this is the case, we can do two things: # Test the same rounds in phab-01 forcing joining Triagers instead of signing the Etiquette, hoping that we get the same results (I don't see why not, but who knows). # Remove Triagers, focus on Day 1, bring back the topic later. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T583 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. To: Aklapper, Qgil Cc: wikibugs-l, Qgil, mmodell, Aklapper, Eloquence, He7d3r, luser, chasemp, jeremyb _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
