Chad added a comment. >>! In T752#12801, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote: >>>! In T752#12673, @Qgil wrote: >>>>! In T616#12534, @Qgil wrote: >>>>>! In T616#12532, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote: >>>> We should probably check first if there are any performance issues before >>>> just plunging on ahead >>> >>> Of course. Something like this should be deployed first on phab-01 or >>> another Labs instance for testing. >> >> If this is in fact manual work, we cannot do it twice. Unless there is a way >> to include all this information in the Phabricator labs Puppet rules? > > My comment was about the use of Diffusion as a replacement for **GitBlit** > (read-only Web browsing of repos), and that we should quickly sanity-check > performance before just doing it for all repos. However, you can have lots of > read-only copies of a repo, so it's not urgent to switch GitBlit off. We can > do it a few dozen times (but let's not). >
No, we can't do it a few dozen times I think. The repositories can be renamed easily enough in Phabricator (as can their clone paths). The callsign is forever and once URLs start building on them I wouldn't want to delete them for a manual rename. >>>! In T752#12673, @Qgil wrote: >>>>! In T752#12599, @Chad wrote: >>> I think we'll have to do the repositories one by one with a signup process. >> >> Alright, then this probably invalidates this other statement? > > No, this comment is about switching to Diffusion as the replacement for > **Gerrit** (master server for a repo, in which it is changed). Because you > can only ever have one master, this means a breaking change: > * manually disabling write in Gerrit for the repo > * manually(?) enabling write in Diffusion for the repo > * getting everyone using the repo to change their remote repo configuration > * updating all the documentation > This is both tedious and not something we can rush, but once we've got a > mostly-agreed workflow process in place (including CI integration working) we > will be able to do this for a few isolated repos to verify it works, and then > at some point throw the switch and make everyone switch. We're generally in agreement here. Except I also meant it for Gitblit replacement per above. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T752 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. To: Chad Cc: wikibugs-l, Qgil, MZMcBride, Chad, Jdforrester-WMF, jeremyb, Aklapper _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
