https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72253
--- Comment #3 from Luis Villa (WMF Legal) <lvi...@wikimedia.org> --- As a legal matter, what I care about is that we, the Foundation, have permission to have the code on our servers without needing to review each individual license. So as long as only open source code (i.e., in this case, not the compiler) is on our servers, that is legally fine by me. (The compiler obviously can't live on labs.) As a policy matter, part of why we have an open source requirement is to make sure the code can be reviewed, maintained, and improved by others. I don't think this meets that requirement, but I don't think we've ever actually written it down as a hard/fast requirement because it was always previously covered by the first point. So I'm inclined to say "no" but I think the second point is up for discussion and my "no" shouldn't be taken as a hard/fast refusal from legal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
