https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #55 from ABX <abx...@gmail.com> 2010-07-26 16:25:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #54) > I would say it could convert the first reflexive link in the > intro section of the article body to a DFN equally well, therefore allowing > DFN > is not necessary for this use case. The advantage is that the link uses wiki > syntax, not HTML syntax. How would that work for wiktionaries, wikispecies, wikisources with OCR of old encyclopedias and all other places where main definition is placed differently than in pedia? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
