https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13978
--- Comment #25 from Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4...@msn.com> 2010-08-26 21:05:16
UTC ---
The core commitRollback() function always auto-patrols. FR can't really control
that nicely. Eventually most of FR's usage of RC patrol will be removed, which
already started with the (pending review) and (unreviewed) links on
RC/watchlist/RLC pages (to replace ! marks).
I don't have *strong* feelings on making rollback implicitly autoreview (to the
lowest level). Is that what this comes down to and nothing else? Or should the
flags be identical to the base revision that the page was reverted to? The only
thing I worry about ("exploits") are template/file vandalism/misinformation
that slips through on a page that uses them (the templates) without notice (on
rollback).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
