https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27836
--- Comment #3 from Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4...@msn.com> 2011-03-15 18:09:08 UTC --- Many older reviewed (stableid=x in URL) versions of pages that use that file also have blue links. Newer ones don't. The ones that have blue links are page versions reviewed before the file was uploaded (jan 2011). That suggest two possibilities: (i) The templates (header boxes, portal boxes) used on those pages referenced the coat of arms file before it was created and it was a redlink when the pages where reviewed. I doubt people reviewed pages with a bunch of redlinked files though. (ii) The templates didn't reference the coat of arms file when those pages were reviewed, but the current *stable version* of the templates *now* use the file. This means that the reviewed version of the pages using the templates now use the file too, but the reviewer never specified a version. What *should* happen is that the current file is used in that case, not a blue link. I'll look at this further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
