https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29111
--- Comment #25 from Brion Vibber <br...@wikimedia.org> 2011-05-25 19:42:57 UTC --- Note in particular re: Special:Version -- you should not use this as a test as its performance may vary *significantly* over time as extensions are added and removed, more or less data is shown on it, and the way the extension info gets loaded and formatted changes across versions. Special:BlankPage is designed as a helper to test the basic framework pieces without variations from the page's content generation. MWJames, assuming your other tests are measuring server CPU time (the PDFs don't say how you're measuring) they seem to be roughly in line with the expectations of a 10-20% speed hit on some of the server-side work, which matches Wikimedia's production 1.17 deployment and the ad-hoc tests we've tried above. As noted above, you may still see an overall improvement in load time in the browser depending on how efficiently the more heavily-optimized load.php code path runs for loading the scripts, styles, and icons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
