| hoo added a comment. |
In T191631#4126290, @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote:Also I wonder, why we even bothering clearing out term_weight… having 0.0 probably has very little/ no benefit compared to just having something in there.
Hm, good point… but perhaps it could be confusing for replica db users if some rows still have the term_weight even if they’re not supposed to rely on it?
If you want, I can remove it from the script and clear only the term_search_key.
IMO the tables are primarily an internal interface, so there's no need for such niceness… not updating the field will also mean less UPDATE load when doing this.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, hoo
Cc: hoo, gerritbot, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, lisong, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Mbch331
Cc: hoo, gerritbot, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, lisong, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
