| Amire80 added a comment. |
Here, again, by convention, everything that is valid in Biblical is also valid in Modern (some of these words and forms are actually common in modern written Hebrew and some aren't, but all are valid in theory). All modern Hebrew dictionaries include usage examples from the Biblical language, and a comprehensive Hebrew dictionary includes all the Biblical words. Marking a citation as coming from the Bible is functionally equivalent to marking it as Biblical Hebrew (does Wikibase Lexeme have usage examples?)
A different issue would be producing a dictionary that is dedicated to the Biblical Hebrew. Brown-Driver-Briggs is a famous real-world example, and it's in the public domain. I'm not sure that it's the intended use of Lexical Wikidata to produce copies of particular published public domain dictionaries, but it would certainly be a valid use case if you ask me. In this use case, using only Biblical Hebrew is a well defined constraint, and for this hbo would be a valid distinct code. But is such use case actually planned?
Cc: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Amire80, gerritbot, Mbch331, PokestarFan, Esc3300, Lydia_Pintscher, GerardM, jhsoby, Aklapper, Bugreporter, Kieubinhtb, Gaboe420, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, tabish.shaikh91, Adrian1985, Asad_Ali_Palijo, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Bsandipan, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Soteriaspace, RazeSoldier, Jayprakash12345, Th3d3v1ls, JakeTheDeveloper, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, Zoranzoki21, merbst, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Maathavan, TerraCodes, D3r1ck01, MuhammadShuaib, SimmeD, Wikidata-bugs, aude, TheDJ
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
