| Krinkle added a comment. |
In T212189#4840406, @daniel wrote:So, overall, it seems like the solution proposed by the Wikidata team is the only one viable at this time. I'm not very happy about this, but I don't really see an alternative. [..]
I'll look into this RFC in more detail at a later time, but at glance, this does not seem fair.
As currently presented, it appears this RFC is lacking a problem statement. It isn't solving a product need, user need, or technological need. Rather, it starts out on the assumption that we're going to have UI code in production (based on Vue.js) written in a way that contains too much business logic in its templating code.
If we're talking about a new approach for Wikidata front-end, I think it makes sense to generalise the acceptance criteria to the larger problem being solved. If we keep the above (seemingly artificial) restriction in place then, in my opinion, there is no room for an RFC conversation to take place.
Cc: CDanis, akosiaris, Krinkle, Milimetric, daniel, mobrovac, Joe, Matthias_Geisler_WMDE, Jakob_WMDE, Pablo-WMDE, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_WMDE, Addshore, WMDE-leszek, Legado_Shulgin, Nandana, thifranc, AndyTan, kostajh, Davinaclare77, Qtn1293, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Th3d3v1ls, Hfbn0, QZanden, LawExplorer, Zppix, _jensen, D3r1ck01, SBisson, Wong128hk, Eevans, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, faidon, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, fgiunchedi, Legoktm
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
