| WMDE-leszek added a comment. |
In T213318#4880414, @Joe wrote:Personally, I'd like to get a more detailed description of how you plan to integrate parts of the UI you will still get from MediaWiki itself - the original plan I saw considered ESI, which is not a solution we (SRE team) like much.
Sorry for the possibly disappointing answer: From Wikidata dev team perspective, we're not really have a particular opinion on what would be the best way of integrating/building up the UI together (i.e. to move away from doing it from inside MW): whether it would be ESI, the other node-powered solution you've mentioned @Joe, or something else. We are really agnostic to the actual way, clearly we see a reason to not have the Wikidata UI service called from inside PHP MW process as a permanent solution. We are happy to participate in discussion on coming up with the better front-end solution. At very least, we could provide input on what would be important features from Wikidata's perspective (as we see Wikidata use case is surely a bit different than e.g. Wikipedia one). That seems to be a topic for another RFC, though :)
Also, regarding skipping caching or not. We are not suggesting either way in scope of this RFC. Caching seems out of scope here. Of course, it is obvious to us that if metrics show that adding caching layer to any components makes sense, that seems like a great thing to do.
Cc: jijiki, CDanis, ArielGlenn, Milimetric, akosiaris, Joe, mobrovac, Krinkle, daniel, Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_WMDE, Addshore, Matthias_Geisler_WMDE, Jakob_WMDE, Pablo-WMDE, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, Nandana, kostajh, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, D3r1ck01, SBisson, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, Legoktm
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
