| Jc86035 added a comment. |
Considering the Commons RfC which occurred after this task was opened (see T208494):
- Is there a good reason to favour LilyPond over other music notation formats? LilyPond is presently the only notation software supported by MediaWiki, but it may be worth considering other formats. The last few comments in T208494 might be helpful. (For what it's worth, almost all of the LilyPond notation statements in Wikidata were added by me through my semi-automated creation of items for musical chords.)
- Would it be useful to support more than one format?
- If/when it becomes possible to store musical notation files on Commons, would the property still be preferable over linking to Commons files?
- In my use of the property (e.g. Q58233594), I've used a lot of formatting, in part to match existing Commons files (e.g. File:Chord Dâ™7.svg). Would it be desirable to encourage this? Would the property need coding conventions?
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Jc86035
Cc: Mahir256, mb, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Jc86035, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Ebe123, Lydia_Pintscher, Mbch331
Cc: Mahir256, mb, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Jc86035, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Ebe123, Lydia_Pintscher, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
