Addshore added a comment.
In T214362#4970952 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362#4970952>, @daniel wrote: > In T214362#4970942 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362#4970942>, @Addshore wrote: > > > We can continue to generate constraint check data on the fly when missing in GETs and simply not put it in the storage. > > > you could trigger a job in that case. the job may even contain the generated data, though that may get too big in some cases. Yes we could still trigger a job on the GET :) Probably cleaner to just have it run again, this won't be a high traffic use case and will slowly vanish so no need to worry about the duplicated effort / wasted cycles. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Addshore Cc: Marostegui, Joe, daniel, Agabi10, Aklapper, Addshore, Nandana, kostajh, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, D3r1ck01, SBisson, Eevans, mobrovac, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, Legoktm
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
