Gehel added a comment.
In T221632#5132147 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221632#5132147>, @Smalyshev wrote: > This also makes me note that if we do introduce sharding (in any shape, either with Blazegraph or another solution) we'd need even more servers, since each shard would need to be at least on 2-3 servers to survive, so for sharding to make any sense we'd need at least 6, maybe even more servers, otherwise we'd just store every or nearly every shard on every server, which makes sharding pointless. > > So if we'd want resilience to loss of a server and meaningful sharding, we'd need something like 2x servers probably. As discussed on IRC, this depends a lot on what the future solution is, how it shards / replicate, and what the scaling strategy is. I don't think we can take any decision on the future architecture at this point. We might want to reserve //some// budget for whatever solution we come up with, but the scope isn't defined enough yet to have any meaningful estimate. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221632 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Gehel Cc: Smalyshev, Aklapper, Gehel, alaa_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
