alaa_wmde added a comment.
In T214884#5264763 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214884#5264763>, @Ladsgroup wrote: > In T214884#5264614 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214884#5264614>, @Esc3300 wrote: > > > We could use the https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q64335281 approach. Also solves the problem of structured data on EntitySchemas. > > > That is a hack, if we need to have structured data on EntitySchemas, then entity schemas need to be entities as well. I see your point. But I think too much generalization can be at fault here and would lead to undesirable coupling on conceptual level between schemas and entities. In this task, we only need to link to them so far. Theree's no clear need nor requirement for having structured data on EntitySchemas within Wikidata itself. That could change of course, and even then it would probably be cleaner for entity schemas to keep their own domain that does not inherit from Wikibase domain. Then Wikidata can represent those schemas with items to have some structured data on them .. this will allow entity schemas to come, be stored and develop freely from being bound to Wikibase DataModel (and therefore, pragmatically, its software tech stack & choices). TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214884 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: alaa_wmde Cc: Ladsgroup, Jheald, Michael, alaa_wmde, ericP, Esc3300, Moebeus, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, darthmon_wmde, pdehaye, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, Andrawaag, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, YULdigitalpreservation, LawExplorer, Salgo60, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, MisterSynergy, abian, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
