alaa_wmde added a comment.
In T220958#5272565 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220958#5272565>, @Addshore wrote: > I left an initial comment on the ticket covering WikibaseLexeme and I thought that could be a good place to start. > One of the things flagged probably isnt worth fixing, as for what is flagged in the other (first) image over there, its pretty hard to decipher as it is. > Does the tool have output of the classes that it has detected dependencies between rather than just the namespace? Yup I think the classes you are looking for are in the next sub-task T220963: Break cyclic class dependencies in WikibaseLexeme <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220963>. Which makes me wonder why do we need separate sub-tasks for namespaces alone. Arguable that made the issue between DummyObjects and Model namespaces much clearer more quickly perhaps, than if we had to look at the classes and figure that it was just name-space incorrect positioning? One thing we can do is kill namespace sub-tasks, and include namespace circular dependency images within the classes sub-tasks for reference, in case they help as a farther view of those circular dependencies. Does that make any sense? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220958 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: alaa_wmde Cc: Addshore, Ladsgroup, Aklapper, alaa_wmde, darthmon_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Jayprakash12345, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Dinoguy1000, Mbch331, Jay8g
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
