Ladsgroup added a comment.
In T48643#5363240 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T48643#5363240>, @alaa_wmde wrote: > This sounds like a nice idea.. > In order to be able to order this in proper priority, do we have any measurements/hypothesis on what we would solve/gain with this change? or is it just anticipating future risks and trying to proactively do something? On gains, This is more about resilience IMO. We have two documented incident regarding dispatching <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=dispatching+prefix%3AIncident+documentation%2F&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1&ns12=1&ns116=1&ns498=1> but I think there are more. There have been scheduled down times due to reboot of mwmaint nodes, etc. All of them would be avoided. I say this might gives us another 9 in dipsatching uptime. Would that work for you? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T48643 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Ladsgroup Cc: alaa_wmde, Ladsgroup, Joe, Addshore, Aklapper, Tobi_WMDE_SW, JanZerebecki, Wikidata-bugs, Abraham, Nemo_bis, Denny, aude, Ricordisamoa, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, hoo, darthmon_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
