Daimona added a comment.
In T250720#6073559 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250720#6073559>, @Ahmad252 wrote: > In T250720#6072828 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250720#6072828>, @Daimona wrote: > >> Haven't checked deeply, but a possible hint is that AF doesn't see automatic edit summaries (I think there was a task for that) which, however, it sees when retrospectively examinating edits. > > But still, the edit summary it sees (the *real* summary) is something like `/* undo:0||REVID|USERNAME */`. It depends on how you define "real". I have to say, I'm not at all certain about the summary that the filter is effectively seeing, so... I don't even know where the 'undo:0 ...' part is coming from in Wikibase, so I can't tell whether it can be read by the AF. In T250720#6074608 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250720#6074608>, @matej_suchanek wrote: > For testing, I re-used blank https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/31 with > > 'undo:0' in summary > > During the test, there were at least 9 undo actions (tagged as `mw-undo`, example <https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q1659640&curid=1593296&diff=1162557029&oldid=1161698093>) but none of them triggered the filter. So @Daimona may be right... Not surprising... I'd be glad to confirm this and investigate it locally, but I don't have Wikibase installed on my wiki, and it's also not so easy to install IIRC (also I'm not practical with it). TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250720 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Daimona Cc: matej_suchanek, Ahmad252, Daimona, Aklapper, Bovlb, darthmon_wmde, 94rain, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, ihojose, QZanden, LawExplorer, Litanwei, JJMC89, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wong128hk, Nirmos, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Nullzero, Huji, Jackmcbarn, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
