DVrandecic added a comment.

  Thanks @Tpt for pulling me in.
  
  I checked in my own PhD thesis, as I had a short section on that, and ten 
years ago, when I wrote this, basically everything on the Linked Open Data Web 
was http: http://simia.net/download/ontology_evaluation.pdf , p.67
  
  Fortunately, that has changed.
  
  More background can be found here: 
https://wiki.dnb.de/display/DINIAGKIM/HTTP+vs.+HTTPS+in+resource+identification 
from the SWiB18 discussion on the topic.
  
  In my opinion, I would suggest to use the chance and since we are building a 
new resource here, to use https from the start.
  
  It was a mistake that we didn't do that for Wikidata, which was due to the 
fact that Wikipedia only started offering https in 2011, and switched to it 
only in 2015. We are not in that situation today, and can make the right 
decision.
  
  I would love for Wikidata to switch, but that's a different task.
  
  So my recommendation is - which is not informed at all by possible technical 
constraints - to use https wherever possible, and in particular for a any new 
namespaces such as introduced for WCQS and the Commons data dumps to use https 
from the start, even though this means mixing some http and https identifiers.
  
  I would not care about consistency with the Wikidata namespaces. As said, i 
consider that, retroactively, a mistake, and would love to change it.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T258590

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: DVrandecic
Cc: Akuckartz, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Tpt, DVrandecic, CBogen, Multichill, 
Gehel, Aklapper, darthmon_wmde, Nandana, Namenlos314, Lahi, Gq86, 
GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, 
Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, 
Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to