GoranSMilovanovic added a comment.
@Manuel From our 1:1 TUE 17. August 2021: > Number and % of items in WD with (no) sitelinks [split by core, astronomical, citation] **"Core" Wikidata (i.e. Wikidata - (Astronomical Objects + Scholarly Articles))** - number of items w. sitelinks: `27907021`, percent of items w. sitelinks: `31.35%` **Astronomical Objects only** - number of items w. sitelinks: `480508`, percent of items w. sitelinks: `3.99%` **Scholarly Articles only** - number of items w. sitelinks: `22063`, percent of items w. sitelinks: `0.47%` **N.B.** Take into your consideration that this data are //approximate// because an item can be an instanceOf/subclassOf/partOf different classes, and our source dataset here is organize class-wise, not item-wise. However, I doubt that the result would change in a significant way if we would go for a whole new item-wise ETL here. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T288611 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: GoranSMilovanovic Cc: Tobi_WMDE_SW, GoranSMilovanovic, Manuel, Aklapper, Invadibot, maantietaja, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
