Legoktm added a comment.

  Having helped with investigating a WDQS outage caused by a *single* user 
once, I have a lot of sympathy for why we'd want authentication, but I worry 
that putting auth walls up for any access at all is a bad step (we've long had 
similar discussions about this for the MediaWiki API too). I think it would be 
helpful to have pointers to earlier conversations where less drastic measures 
like increased rate limits, or a split of unauthenticated vs authenticated 
traffic were considered and why they were deemed unworkable. And what resources 
are needed to offer this. I read the announcement, and personally I would take 
a reduced SLO + no auth required over having better uptime with authentication 
required.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T290300

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Legoktm
Cc: Legoktm, Fuzheado, LucasWerkmeister, ttaylor, CBogen, Gehel, Aklapper, 
Zache, BPirkle, sdkim, hnowlan, RKemper, Zbyszko, Invadibot, MPhamWMF, 
maantietaja, Akuckartz, Nandana, Namenlos314, Lahi, Gq86, 
Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, 
LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, 
Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to