ItamarWMDE added a comment.

  > You can't just decide that the first two paragraphs a part of some ad hoc 
"core" of the data-model and the third paragraph is just supplementary and 
doesn't matter anymore.
  
  I am really not sure where this interpretation is coming from. I'm not 
ignoring this paragraph, I referred to it before in this conversation and I 
believe it only strengthens my point: **"can be constructed based on the ranks 
defined above"** is exactly where I get that there are core values to rank, and 
that "best" isn't one of them.
  
  At this point, I would like to stop and ask how useful this discussion is? I 
have not seen an argument that gives any examples as to how expecting our 
interface consumers (that is, users) to know about the three values allowed in 
rank, and their ordering "preferred then normal, never deprecated" makes the 
system harder to use, harder to reason about or even fails to implement some 
domain logic.
  
  I would suggest focusing this debate on finding a solution rather than just 
continuing this circular argumentation. Likewise, I'm not here to target 
anyone, I try to present examples to back up my reasoning, and I would like to 
receive the same courtesy from you.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T305535

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: ItamarWMDE
Cc: Addshore, WMDE-leszek, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, Nikki, Mahir256, 
Bugreporter, Erdinc_Ciftci_WMDE, guergana.tzatchkova, ItamarWMDE, noarave, 
Michael, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, 
maantietaja, Akuckartz, Nandana, lucamauri, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, 
QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Bodhisattwa, Scott_WUaS, 
Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to