Filceolaire added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94404#1186925, @daniel wrote:
> @thiemowmde The number of incoming links would be the best indicator, since > it directly correlates with the probability of the user wanting to link to > the entity. But calculating it is too expensive, even on edit; Cirrus search > has a similar problem, and a solution (I don't remember, ask Nik). Once we > move term lookup to Elastic, we can use it. What if we stored the most used values for each property and updated it once a week? That wouldn't be expensive to calculate, would it? Even if we stored the top fifty values? If we can do this once we move to Elastic search then should we just shelve this bug till we have Elastic search since basing the recommendations on what is used elsewhere by the property is definitely the way to go. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94404 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: daniel, Filceolaire Cc: Filceolaire, gerritbot, thiemowmde, matej_suchanek, Ricordisamoa, Sjoerddebruin, aude, daniel, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Wikidata-bugs _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
