AndrewTavis_WMDE added a comment.
> We might create a little report for this and the coming WDQS task. We could do this, yes. Do you mean something in Google Docs? (I mention a readme with the code below as another alternative) > In terms of code documentation GitHub would make sense to me. That way we can link to it in the report and we (and others) can find it easily in the repo in case we need to rerun it. What would you think makes most sense? GitHub makes sense for visibility, and I'd say we should try to figure out the repo structure we'll be operating from. For small tasks like this I think it makes sense that the work goes into a general `wmde/wikidata-analytics/tasks` directory or the like, whereas larger projects would get their own repos in `wmde`. We can split the `tasks` directory into maybe quarters or something like this so we're not dumping things into it endlessly, and then any code that's able to be open-sourced can be along with a quick `README.md` file that would serve as the report? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T337021 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: AndrewTavis_WMDE Cc: Manuel, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Astuthiodit_1, AWesterinen, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Namenlos314, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
