dcausse added a comment.
@Physikerwelt thanks for your feedback. Blazegraph is definitely not the best solution and the work to move off of blazegraph should be tracked under https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330525 (see the initial exploration <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/File:WDQS_Backend_Alternatives_working_paper.pdf> we have done). The solutions you suggest might be better discussed in their own tickets as a subtask of T335067 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T335067>. This particular ticket is about collecting feedback regarding use-cases that might be affected by the split. This split is one of the solution we want to experiment to address the scalabity issues of WDQS <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata_Query_Service/ScalingStrategy>. We are conscious about the usability issues that you raise but at this point we are more focused on understanding the feasibility and limitations of federation with such a split. It should be worth noting that one goal is to be sure that use-cases not relying on the scientific articles should still work without federation. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T356773 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Sannita, dcausse Cc: Physikerwelt, EgonWillighagen, ArthurPSmith, Sj, dcausse, valerio.bozzolan, tfmorris, Gehel, Aklapper, Danny_Benjafield_WMDE, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, KimKelting, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
