Jc3s5h added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72395#1325530, @daniel wrote:
> What's the status of this? We have changed the interpretation of the internal > model as well as the UI and API quite a bit with regard to the calendar > model. Ignoring the fact that the data we currently have in the database is > inconsistent, is there still a problem with the UI being confusing? I thought the internal model was still under discussion, and nothing had been decided on that. See https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T99674. At present the user interface will not accept a date that is valid in the Julian calendar but invalid in the Gregorian calendar, such as 29 February 1700. See https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98194. Users who observe this behavior are likely to believe that only the (possibly proleptic) Gregorian calendar is supported and disbelieve all documentation to the contrary; action speak louder than words. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72395 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Jc3s5h Cc: daniel, Conny, Wikidata-bugs, JulesWinnfield-hu, Tobi_WMDE_SW, Denny, Snaterlicious, Jc3s5h, Lydia_Pintscher, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
