Bene added a comment.

Including both sitelinks and identifiers in one section is going to be hard DOM 
wise and this mostly indicates a logical issue as well. The DOM for sitelinks 
is generated in `SiteLinksView`. We could now go ahead and also add the 
identifiers in there but that won't work in two ways: We don't have the 
information about statements in `SiteLinksView` but only a list of sitelinks 
and not all entities which have identifiers may also have sitelinks.

For these two reasons I think it is better to have three sections and separate 
sitelinks and identifiers. Furthermore, including two different UIs (for 
statements and sitelinks) in one section will also be bad considering the 
user-friendlyness.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95884

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Bene
Cc: gerritbot, Moushira, Jdlrobson, Lydia_Pintscher, MaxSem, Florian, Aklapper, 
Snaterlicious, adrianheine, thiemowmde, Bene, Wikidata-bugs, aude



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to