Bene added a comment. Including both sitelinks and identifiers in one section is going to be hard DOM wise and this mostly indicates a logical issue as well. The DOM for sitelinks is generated in `SiteLinksView`. We could now go ahead and also add the identifiers in there but that won't work in two ways: We don't have the information about statements in `SiteLinksView` but only a list of sitelinks and not all entities which have identifiers may also have sitelinks.
For these two reasons I think it is better to have three sections and separate sitelinks and identifiers. Furthermore, including two different UIs (for statements and sitelinks) in one section will also be bad considering the user-friendlyness. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95884 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Bene Cc: gerritbot, Moushira, Jdlrobson, Lydia_Pintscher, MaxSem, Florian, Aklapper, Snaterlicious, adrianheine, thiemowmde, Bene, Wikidata-bugs, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs