mkroetzsch added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95316#1373937, @Lydia_Pintscher wrote:
> Are there any differences we're missing? Are we ok with these differences? I will do a complete review of the update RDF mapping in the course of the next week. I will report back then if there is anything missing in the diff. Also, what is the expected outcome of this bug? A table like the one posted by Lucie? Or something with more detail? Some rows in the current table are probably only understood by people who already know both dumps ;-) Is this meant to be only for our "internal" information? Another relevant note here might be that the plan is to fully align WDTK mappings with the updated RDF dumps, so that many of the above will go away (the split into several files would remain though). We just did not do this while we were still discussing the updated RDF mapping. @Lucie: - The second row difference is just a consequence of what was already stated in the first row (NTriples vs Turtle). Maybe this can be merged/deleted. - It seems that the entry in row "labels (&aliases&descriptions)" only refers to "labels". The properties "skos:prefLabel" and "schema:name" are not used for descriptions or aliases in either dumps, AFAIK. - It would make sense to distinguish differences in distribution/surface syntax (which format, how many files, which compression algorithm, ...) from real differences in the RDF model (=differences that matter for SPARQL users). TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95316 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lucie, mkroetzsch Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, mkroetzsch, daniel, Smalyshev, Aklapper, Lucie, Wikidata-bugs, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
