thiemowmde added subscribers: JanZerebecki, Jonas.
thiemowmde added a comment.

Random PDFs found via this Google search 
<https://www.google.de/search?q=uncertainty+plus+minus+one>:

Pro ±1
======

http://physicsed.buffalostate.edu/pubs/MeasurementAnalysis/MA1_9ed.pdf says:

> Determining uncertainties is a bit more challenging since you—not the 
> measuring device— must determine them. When determining an uncertainty from a 
> measuring device, you need to first determine the smallest quantity that can 
> be resolved on the device. Then [...] the uncertainty in the measurement is 
> taken to be this value. For example, if a digital readout displays 1.35 g, 
> then you should write that measurement as (1.35 ± 0.01) g. The smallest 
> division you can clearly read is your uncertainty.


Note that this document is mostly talking about reading from **analog** 
devices, even if the quoted text says "digital readout". Personally, I think 
there is something confused.

Pro ±0.5
========

https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/documents/gruanmanuals/UK_NPL/mgpg11.pdf 
says:

> The divisions on the tape are millimetres. Reading to the nearest division 
> gives an error of no more than ±0.5 mm. We can take this to be a uniformly 
> distributed uncertainty (the true readings could lie variously anywhere in 
> the 1 mm interval - i.e. ±0.5 mm).


http://www.calpoly.edu/~gthorncr/ME236/documents/Exp.1.IntroductiontoMeasurement.pdf
 says:

> The procedure for taking [a] reading [from a digital display] is simple: 
> Record exactly what you read from the digital display. [...] 0.30 g. Note 
> that a value of 0.3 g or 0.300 g is incorrect, because either value 
> misrepresents the resolution of the device. [...] the true value of the mass 
> is within 0.2950 ≤ mass ≤ 0.3049. This is implied because the device will 
> round any value in this range to 0.30, the closest reading on the display. It 
> is standard to record this measurement as **mass = 0.30 ± 0.005 g**. In the 
> above format, the value 0.30 is called the nominal value. The second term, ± 
> 0.005, is called the reading error. It is equal to one-half the resolution 
> (the smallest division between readings, sometimes called the least count for 
> digital devices).



TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T105623

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: thiemowmde
Cc: Jonas, JanZerebecki, harej-NIOSH, Thryduulf, Mike_Peel, Jc3s5h, thiemowmde, 
kaldari, daniel, Stryn, Lydia_Pintscher, Liuxinyu970226, Snipre, Event, 
Ash_Crow, mgrabovsky, Micru, Denny, He7d3r, Bene, Wikidata-bugs, Ricordisamoa, 
Kelson, MSGJ, Wolfvoll, Aklapper, aude



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to