Addshore added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125392#1993813, @BBlack wrote:
> FYI - "cache_status" is not an accurate reflection of anything. I'm not sure > why we really even log it for analytics. The problem is that it only > reflects some varnish state about the first of up to 3 layers of caching, and > even then it does so poorly. Yep, we established that. So with all page loads, the first load of a page seems to be a cache miss, and after that loads of the same page will be passes. For Anons they will either get a miss or a hit. Which means passes are only logged in users, hits are only anons, but misses are a mixture of the two. So the numbers for logged in users in the spreadsheet linked are generated from: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Group-user.js&oldid=298792111 Which is then counted in the web request logs (yes we know this is terrible) The difference between the logged in page views and the hits, missed and passes can be seen in the spreadsheet TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T125392 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Addshore Cc: JanZerebecki, Milimetric, BBlack, ori, gerritbot, hoo, daniel, Aklapper, Addshore, Lydia_Pintscher, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331 _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
