| Kiailandi added a comment. |
In T167970#3351555, @Afnecors wrote:As MediaWiki we could use JSDuck.
It seems a good idea to comply with the coding conventions, but just to check (considering we are not using Ext JS):
Quoting the JSDuck FAQ
Q: Can I use JSDuck with non-ExtJS project?
A: [...] JSDuck will happily parse any valid _javascript_, but as its auto-detection capabilities are tuned for ExtJS, you'll probably need to document more things explicitly with @tags rather than relying on the auto-detection.
[...] If you're structuring your code in OOP-manner (like Ext JS is structured) JSDuck is probably a good fit. But when you're structuring your code in functional style (like jQuery), you might be better off with a different tool.
We don't plan to use functional style in our code right?
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Afnecors, Kiailandi
Cc: Kiailandi, Ricordisamoa, Aklapper, Afnecors, dachary, Hjfocs, Wikidata-bugs, Sjoerddebruin, Mbch331
Cc: Kiailandi, Ricordisamoa, Aklapper, Afnecors, dachary, Hjfocs, Wikidata-bugs, Sjoerddebruin, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
